ACLU
Of
FBI’s Power To Track
And Map “Behaviors” And “Lifestyle Characteristics” Of American Communities
Raises Alarm
July
27, 2010
”Without
more information, there is no way to know the extent of the FBI’s racial data
gathering and mapping practices and whether the agency is abusing its
authority,” said Allison Neal, Legal Director with the ACLU of Alabama. “The
public deserves to know about a community mapping program with such potentially
large implications for civil liberties and civil rights.”
The
FBI’s power to collect, use, and map racial and ethnic data in order to assist
the FBI’s “domain awareness” and “intelligence analysis” activities is
described in the 2008 FBI Domestic Intelligence and Operations Guide (DIOG).
The FBI released the DIOG in heavily redacted form in September 2009, but a
less-censored version was not made public until January of this year, in
response to a lawsuit filed by Muslim Advocates. Although the DIOG has been in
effect for more than a year and a half, very little information is available to
the public about how the FBI has implemented this authority.
“The
FBI’s mapping of local communities and businesses based on race and ethnicity,
as well as its ability to target communities for investigation based on
supposed racial and ethnic behaviors, raises serious civil liberties concerns,”
said Michael German, ACLU policy counsel and former FBI agent. “Creating a
profile of a neighborhood for criminal law enforcement or domestic intelligence
purposes based on the ethnic makeup of the people who live there or the types
of businesses they run is unfair, un-American and will certainly not help stop
crime.”
ACLU
affiliate offices across the nation today filed coordinated Freedom of Information
Act requests to uncover records about the FBI’s collection and use of racial
and ethnicity data from their local FBI field offices. The requests were filed
by the ACLU affiliates in Alabama, Arkansas, California (Northern, Southern and
San Diego), Colorado, Connecticut, Washington, D.C., Delaware, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,
Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont and
Virginia.
The
DIOG provisions in question are available online at: www.muslimadvocates.org/DIOGs_Chapter4.pdf
The
entire DIOG is at: www.muslimadvocates.org/latest/profiling_update/community_alert_seek_legal_adv.html