Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al. v. Marshall et al.

  • Filed: 04/04/2024
  • Status: Active
  • Latest Update: Apr 04, 2024
Placeholder image

Civil Rights, Voting Rights, Disability Rights Groups Sue Alabama Over SB 1’s Extreme Anti-Voter Restrictions and Penalties

A coalition of civil rights, voting rights and disability rights organizations filed a lawsuit in federal court against Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, Alabama’s 42 District Attorneys, and Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen to block Alabama’s recently-enacted Senate Bill 1 (SB 1). This law directly targets, drastically restricts, and severely penalizes basic nonpartisan civic engagement efforts that enable all Alabamians to access their freedom to vote.

Under SB 1’s severe restrictions, the work of numerous community members, non-partisan organizations, and volunteers, who promote election participation across Alabama, is now criminalized. SB 1 now makes it a Class B felony – punishable by up to 20 years in prison – to provide a stamp or sticker to your neighbor when providing them routine absentee ballot application assistance. Other Class B felonies in Alabama include first-degree manslaughter and second-degree rape. SB 1 also makes it a felony to “receive a payment or a gift” from someone providing routine absentee application assistance.

SB 1’s criminal penalties are not just limited to when payments or gifts are exchanged. Under the new law, it is a misdemeanor to “prefill” or “submit” another person’s absentee ballot application. Again, the bill leaves these terms undefined, meaning that a community member who delivers a disabled neighbor’s absentee ballot application to USPS could be charged with a misdemeanor.

As a result of SB 1’s high criminal penalties and undefined terms, community organizations and volunteers are left to guess what voter engagement activities could lead to decades behind bars. Both prosecution under SB 1, and the chilling effect the law has on pro-democracy activities, violates numerous fundamental constitutional rights, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Alabama already has some of the most burdensome and restrictive voting laws. Alabama is just one of four states without early in-person voting and one of just fourteen states that requires an “excuse” for absentee voting. Further, unlike nearly every other state, there is no broad right to vote absentee for Alabamians over age 65 or for everyone with a disability. Civic rights, voting rights, and disability rights groups offer critical assistance to voters who must navigate these complex restrictions and procedures in order to exercise their right to vote.

Absent a court decision preventing the Attorney General and Alabama District Attorneys from charging and prosecuting community organizations and volunteers who provide routine absentee ballot application assistance, many eligible voters – including those who are elderly, disabled, or blind – will be unable to receive the necessary assistance they require to vote. Rather than putting resources into increasing civic engagement, SB 1 creates new unconstitutional barriers and criminal penalties for people trying to assist neighbors who want to exercise their right to vote absentee.

The lawsuit filed today challenges SB 1 as violating the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act, and the Help America Vote Act of 2002.

The lawsuit, Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, et al. v. Marshall, et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama by the ACLU of Alabama, Campaign Legal Center, Legal Defense Fund, and Southern Poverty Law Center, on behalf of the Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, Greater Birmingham Ministries, League of Women Voters of Alabama, and Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program.

Alabama State Conference of NAACP, et al v. Marshall, et al.pdf

Modern-Day Voting Discrimination in Alabama

Congress must act to expand the protections of the Voting Rights Act and restore the preclearance provisions for jurisdictions that persist in enacting discriminatory voting laws and districting schemes.

By Laurel Hattix

Testimony: Modern-Day Voting Discrimination in Alabama

The State Senators Proposing SB1 Are Hurting Their Own Party

SB1 seeks to rectify a problem that does not exist in the state of Alabama.

By Samuel Duff

Hurting Their Own Party

Related News & Podcasts

News & Commentary
Feb 29, 2024
Testimony: Modern-Day Voting Discrimination in Alabama
  • Voting Rights

Modern-Day Voting Discrimination in Alabama

Congress must act to expand the protections of the Voting Rights Act and restore the preclearance provisions for jurisdictions that persist in enacting discriminatory voting laws and districting schemes.
News & Commentary
Feb 07, 2024
Hurting Their Own Party
  • Voting Rights

The State Senators Proposing SB1 Are Hurting Their Own Party

SB1 seeks to rectify a problem that does not exist in the state of Alabama.

Related Content

Legislation
Feb 05, 2024
The ACLU of Alabama opposes this.
  • Voting Rights

SB1 – Criminalizing Absentee Ballot Assistance

SB1 1 will make it a felony for absentee ballot applications or ballots to be distributed, ordered, requested, collected, etc. by a person other than the absentee voter.
Status: In committee
Position: Oppose
Resource
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

What's at Stake

Resource
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

Questions or concerns while voting?

Resource
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

Voting as a Student